Author: Editor

Western Australia, the Late Federation Settlement and the Imperial Examination of the Constitution Bill

Posted onAuthorEditor

Western Australia’s entry into the Australian Commonwealth occurred at a critical stage in the Federation process. Unlike the eastern colonies, which had participated in the constitutional conventions and had approved the Constitution Bill through referendums in 1898 and 1899, Western Australia joined the process only after the draft Constitution had already been settled and transmitted Read More …

The Crown, the Constitution and the Meaning of the Deleted Words ‘This Act Binds the Crown’

Posted onAuthorEditor

When the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 was enacted by the Imperial Parliament, the final text differed in a number of respects from the draft approved by the Australian colonies. One of the less publicly discussed changes was the removal of the words contained in the original Covering Clause 2: . “This Act shall Read More …

The Lieber Code: No Longer Binding, Yet Historically Significant

Posted onAuthorEditor

The battlefield has always been a place where chaos threatens to overpower humanity. Throughout history, soldiers marched under banners of victory, yet civilians, prisoners, and the wounded often paid the highest price. Before the nineteenth century, the rules of war were largely unwritten, depending more on military custom than on legal obligation. Then, during the Read More …

Belligerent or Combatant? Non-Belligerent or Non-Combatant? Which one are you?

Posted onAuthorEditor

What is the myth of the Belligerent? Our readers have again asked us to explain the legal meanings of the terms belligerent and combatant. One of the more misleading themes found throughout the “Papers” and promoted by influencers is the repeated use of the word “belligerent” as though it applies to the entire civilian population Read More …

Is Australia a Trust Territory of the United Nations?

Posted onAuthorEditor

“The Truth Shall Set You Free!” Our readers have overwhelmingly reached out seeking clarity on a range of subjects and claims that continue to circulate in Australia. One recurring claim found in various “papers” and promoted by some influencers is that Australia somehow became a United Nations “Trust Territory” following the introduction of the Nationality Read More …

Who Can Bring a Case Before the ICJ and ICC? Common Misunderstanding About International Courts

Posted onAuthorEditor

A recurring misconception in public debate in Australia is that any individual who believes they have suffered an injustice can take their case directly to the world’s highest international courts. In reality, neither the International Court of Justice (ICJ) nor the International Criminal Court (ICC) operates in that way. The International Court of Justice, based Read More …

Push to Repeal “No Jab, No Play” Laws Gains Political and Medical Backing

Posted onAuthorEditor

A proposed amendment to New South Wales public health legislation has reignited debate over Australia’s childhood vaccination policies, with Libertarian MLC John Ruddick preparing to introduce a Bill aimed at dismantling the state’s “No Jab, No Play” framework. The legislation would seek to overturn rules that prevent unvaccinated children from attending childcare services, a policy Read More …

“Who Holds the Power? The Quiet Evolution of Sovereignty in Australia”

Posted onAuthorEditor

In a nation often described as politically stable and constitutionally conservative, a profound shift has taken place, one not marked by revolution or sweeping declarations, but by legal reasoning, referenda, and the gradual development of democratic practice. At the heart of it lies a deceptively simple question: who truly holds sovereign power in Australia? For Read More …