A review by the New South Wales Ombudsman has highlighted an important but often overlooked obligation of police officers: when exercising certain powers under the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (LEPRA), officers are legally required to provide their name and place of duty.
The Ombudsman report below, “Did police provide their name and place of duty?” examined compliance with this rule and revealed a concerning gap between the law and public awareness. While police powers such as stopping, searching, or arresting a person are routinely exercised, there is no consistent system to track whether officers actually identify themselves during these interactions.
According to the review:
Police exercised powers requiring identification on over 400,000 occasions in just one year.
Data on whether officers actually provided their name and duty station was incomplete or limited, leaving compliance largely unmeasured.
Public surveys suggested that roughly half of people recalled being given this information, pointing to significant uncertainty about officer identification in everyday encounters.
Why does this matter??? The requirement is not a formality, it ensures accountability, transparency, and allows individuals to report misconduct if necessary. While changes in 2014 clarified that an officer’s failure to provide their details does not automatically invalidate their actions, the Ombudsman stresses that public knowledge and police compliance remain essential to trust in law enforcement.
The report serves as a reminder for all NSW residents:
If approached by police under LEPRA powers, you have the right to ask the officer to identify themselves, including their name and place of duty.
Officers are legally obliged to provide this information.
Being informed allows you to engage confidently and safely, and if needed, report incidents accurately.
The Ombudsman urges continued police training and community awareness to ensure these obligations are met consistently. Knowledge is power and knowing this right could make all the difference in your next encounter with police.
Other Australian states and territories also have laws regulating police powers and what police must do when interacting with the public, but the specifics vary by jurisdiction. Here’s how it generally works across the country:
New South Wales
In NSW under the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (LEPRA) police must provide their name and place of duty (along with evidence they are a police officer and the reason for exercising a power such as arrest or search) when they exercise relevant powers.
Victoria
In Victoria’s law (The Crimes Act 1958 and Summary Offences Act 1966), police can ask a person for their name and address in specific circumstances (when they reasonably suspect an offence). When doing so, if a person requests the officer’s details, the officer must give their name, rank and station, and can be fined if they refuse.
Queensland
Queensland’s Police Powers and Responsibilities Act 2000 gives police the power to require someone’s name and address if there are reasonable grounds to believe a person has committed or is about to commit an offence. Refusal can lead to arrest or fine. Although Queensland law is not exactly the same wording as NSW’s LEPRA, legal guidance confirms these powers are widely used.
South Australia
Under the Summary Offences Act 1953 (SA), police can require someone to state their personal details (name, date of birth, address) if they reasonably suspect an offence or if the person may assist an investigation. Importantly, if police have required these details, the officer “should identify themselves” if asked, either by showing their police ID or stating their name, rank and identification number.
Western Australia
In WA police powers are governed through the Criminal Investigation Act 2006 and the Criminal Investigation (Identifying People) Act 2002. Police can require a person’s name, date of birth and address if there are reasonable grounds to suspect an offence or that the person can assist an investigation and failure to comply can be an offence. WA law encourages police to provide identification in certain interactions, but the specific statutory name/place of dutyrequirement isn’t expressed in exactly the same terms as NSW’s LEPRA.
Northern Territory and Australian Capital Territory
Both jurisdictions have similar police powers: police can require someone’s details in specific circumstances, and you are generally able to ask police for their name, rank and place of duty. Legal resources for NT confirm you can require police to give their details in writing if they ask for your identity under certain powers.
Tasmania
Tasmanian legislation requires police to identify themselves “if practicable” when exercising powers, including by producing ID or stating their name, rank and place of duty orally or in writing.
52 pages